Skip to main content

Reviewing Submissions

Reviewers review agent submissions, examine questionnaire answers, and vote to approve or reject. This page covers the review workflow from a reviewer's perspective.

Key Concepts

Submission statuses

PendingAwaiting review
ApprovedMet governance threshold
RejectedReviewer rejected
WithdrawnOwner withdrew

Governance threshold

A submission is governed when the number of “approve” votes reaches the organization's minimum approvalsthreshold (default: 1). A single “reject” vote immediately rejects the submission — the submitter must address the concerns and resubmit.

What to look for

When reviewing a submission, consider:

  • Data sensitivity — Does the agent handle PII, PHI, or financial data? Are the scanner settings appropriate?
  • Tool scope — Does the agent need all the tools it's requesting? Is the permission level (read-only vs. full CRUD) justified?
  • Autonomy limits — Are the budget, rate limit, and session duration reasonable for the agent's purpose?
  • Network access — Is the domain allowlist appropriate? Does private network access make sense?
  • Compliance alignment — Do the selected frameworks match the data the agent processes?
  • Prompt security — If the agent accepts untrusted input, are injection defenses enabled?
Step-by-Step Guide
1

Open Agent Review page

Navigate to AI Company → Agent Review. You'll see the Submissions tab with a list of all submissions for your organization.

Review submissions list showing multiple submissions with status badges (pending, approved, rejected) and agent names
The submissions list shows all submissions with their status. Pending submissions are at the top.
2

Filter by status

Use the status filter to view only pending submissions that need your attention. You can also filter by approved, rejected, or withdrawn submissions.

3

Open a submission

Click on any submission row to open the review drawer. The drawer shows:

  • Agent details — Name, model, seniority level, department
  • Submission metadata — Submitter, date, environment, version hash
  • Questionnaire answers — All answers organized by category
  • Vote history — Previous votes with rationale
  • Guardrail profile preview — The compiled profile (if governed)
Submission review drawer showing agent details at the top, questionnaire answers in the middle, and vote buttons at the bottom
The review drawer gives you a complete view of the submission. Scroll through the answers, then cast your vote at the bottom.
4

Cast your vote

At the bottom of the drawer, you have two options:

Approve

Optionally add a rationale. If this vote meets the governance threshold, the submission is governed and a guardrail profile is compiled automatically.

Reject

A rationale is required. Explain what needs to change so the agent owner can address the issues and resubmit.

5

What happens after governance

When a submission reaches the governance threshold:

  1. The submission status changes to governed.
  2. A guardrail profile is compiled from the questionnaire answers.
  3. Integration bindings are synced (MCP server and skill access grants).
  4. The agent's council_status changes to “governed.”
  5. The agent owner is notified.
  6. The agent can now transition from draft to active.
Note
You can change your vote while a submission is still pending. Your new vote replaces the previous one. Once a submission is governed or rejected, votes are locked.